September August July June May April March February January
The Radiology Business Journal (10/10, Wilson) reports that investigators found, after looking at “a more flexible plate as a way to reduce pain during mammography,” that reducing “compression on the center part of the breast by up to 50 percent does not negatively affect the ability to detect cancers.”
The NPR (10/7, Hobson) “Shots” blog reports that “mammography can prevent deaths from breast cancer, but it’s not a perfect test,” as “it misses some cancers, especially in women with dense breast tissue, and flags abnormalities for follow-up tests that turn out to be benign, among other issues.” American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Commission Chair Debra Monticciolo, MD, FACR, and breast imaging commission member Barbara Monsees, MD, FACR, discuss the pros and cons of using other breast imaging technologies to address these issues.
Aunt Minnie (10/6) reports that research suggests “contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can be an effective method for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions, offering improvements in diagnostic accuracy over conventional breast ultrasound.” In the “meta-analysis incorporating nearly 30 studies and more than 2,000 patients,” investigators “found that contrast-enhanced ultrasound offered a combined sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 80%.” Additionally, “diagnostic performance also improved with the advent of second-generation contrast agents.” The findings were published in the Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine.